About the EUC QA rubric
From qaWiki
- Developed as part of a Fund for the Improvement of Post-Secondary Education (FIPSE) grant by the Maryland Online consortium
- Established eight general review standards from learning objectives to accessibility and everything in between
- Each general review standard comprised of specific review standards, which are ranked in importance:
- Essential Standard (worth 3 points)
- Very Important Standard (worth 2 points)
- Important Standard (worth 1 point)
- In order to pass review, a course must:
- Satisfy all essential specific review standards
- Satisfy enough of the remaining specific review standards to accumulate 85% of the total available points (65 out of 76)
- An annotated version of the QM Rubric can be found on the Quality Matters website: http://www.qualitymatters.org/documents.htm
- As stated before, there are eight general review standards:
[edit] Copyright Notice
The EUC QA rubric is based on the Quality Matters Inter-institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Process developed through a FIPSE grant funded by the U.S. Department of Education. Portions of this rubric and process are copyrighted by Quality Matters (e.g. the rubric standards) and the remainder (e.g. standards annotations, examples, supplements) are copyrighted by the South Dakota Board of Regents.
